Velibor has spent nearly ten years working with data, statistics, and the kind of systems that only make sense when every piece is in the right place. With a degree in economics and a background built on analysis, he approaches fact-checking with full attention to the details that are usually overlooked. He does not work off headlines. He reads terms in full, compares them against previous versions, and looks for the one sentence that quietly changed everything.
When a casino offers updates, he checks to see what has changed. When the numbers do not add up, he reruns them. If something does not match, he looks for the source until he can prove exactly where the problem is.
Last updated
29 July 2025
 |
If the terms are buried in an outdated PDF or a forgotten help article, he still reads through them. He checks what is said and what is left out.
When a promotion feels incomplete or inconsistent, he checks how it is presented elsewhere. If one version says less, he digs into why.
Velibor has a habit of remembering layout changes, wording differences, and small edits that others miss. He notices when something is removed or rewritten without explanation.
It does not matter how clean the site looks if the payout conditions are unclear or buried in disclaimers. If he cannot follow the logic on the first attempt, he keeps checking until it makes sense.
Here’s Velibor, unfiltered:
Where do you start when fact-checking a bonus?
I begin with whatever the casino is highlighting. Then I open the full terms and look for the part they chose not to promote.
How do you know something needs checking?
If the explanation is too short or too neat, I assume there is more to it. I treat summaries like trailers. The real story is always in the full version.
What’s your default tab when you’re working?
Usually, a spreadsheet, one or two archive snapshots, and the live version of the terms. I need to see what has changed, not just what is there now.
What’s more frustrating than vague wording?
When two official sources from the same site give different answers. It usually means no one double-checked either.
One tool you couldn’t work without?
Screenshots with timestamps. If the terms change later or disappear completely, I still have a record of what was there when I checked it.
✅ If it doesn’t match twice, it’s probably wrong
A claim is only solid if it appears consistently across formats, pages, and time. When something shows up in one place but is missing elsewhere, that is not evidence. That is uncertainty. Velibor checks every offer in full, compares it to older versions, and only clears it once the information holds up under repeat review.
If the numbers change but the terms stay the same, something was missed. If the offer can only be found in a single location with no source backing it, that is not enough.
Good information is stable, but if something changes, it needs to be rechecked.
We don’t just publish reviews — we test claims, check terms against what’s live, and update content when platforms quietly change the rules. Our fact-checkers document everything, from shifting bonus structures to outdated redemption policies, so what you read is based on more than just the marketing line.
→ Meet the whole SweepCasinos fact-checking team and see how they work
